Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's column >>

ROBERT BLEVINS - AB OF SEATTLE

Home Page
Reporter: 'Are you a mod or a rocker?' Ringo Starr: 'I'm a MOCKER...'
Articles Posted: 480  Links Seeded: 294
Member Since: 3/2007  Last Seen: 5/15/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Where is a Strong U.S. Economy? The Place It's Always Been - With YOU

Tue Feb 7, 2012 12:44 AM EST
business, taxes, recession, opinion, green-energy
By Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Image credit: Max Shlubman, Creative Commons/Flickr.

Image: NASA files. An early artists' conception of the Apollo mission to the moon.

Image Credit: Jamie Hernandez, Creative Commons/Flikr

Advertise | AdChoices

Where are the jobs? Why do the cost of basic necessities and energy keep going up? Where's that recovery we were told would happen by now? Tough questions, with an easier answer: It's up to Americans to keep an eye on the ball and knock it out of the park.

Using a sports analogy is a little simplistic, but there is truth in it. The housing bubble and the stock market plunge only accelerated what was bound to happen anyway. Our trade deficit with China, the vast amount of U.S. currency we send to countries who don't even like us - simply to power our vehicles and way of life - this is the majority of the problem. Couple that with our lack of investment in education, both K-12 and college, and this is a recipe to become a second or third-rate country within a decade.

In a way, the current recession is like a war. If you want to climb out of it, then you have to do your part.

Here's a few ideas:

Encourage our government to expand education to everyone, and ensure YOUR school district is doing its best on K-12. Even with all the college funding in the world, most Americans will finish their education as soon as they graduate high school. This mean our K-12 system needs to be the best it CAN be.

We must Go Green. The rising cost of energy is a serious drain on the economy. Two simple things here. The first country that goes green and becomes the primary manufacturer and producer of renewable energy WINS. That country is guaranteed a strong economy and plenty of jobs. Charity begins at home, though. This means Americans must do their part to cut back energy use.

It's time to return to space. One failing of the Obama administration has been its shortsighted view of NASA. The truth is that NASA employs some of the most intelligent people on the planet, and space work encourages interest in science and math - two subjects that are key to life in the 21st century. NASA's current budget is less than $20 billion a year. This funds the Houston Space Center, the IV and V Center, White Sands, the HQ in DC, the Cape, Glenn Center, Michoud, and a number of others. They also do interactive work with the public, our schools, students, and their teachers. Most of the real cost for NASA was paid for during the Space Race when all the infrastructure was built to go to the Moon. If we don't keep up with the competition, it will be the Chinese, the European Space Agency, or even the Italian Space Agency who become the Keepers of the High Ground. With some governments, this might not be a good thing for America.

Taxes on the rich should go up, while those on the middle class and the poor need to decrease. No one envies those who achieve the American Dream. But if you can afford more, you should PAY more. To the Rich Folks: Don't worry, no one is suggesting you be taxed back to the Stone Age. Just pay your fair share to support a free country that made it possible for you to get rich in the first place.

On the subject of taxes, a Windfall Tax should be instituted on oil companies. These funds should be earmarked specifically toward alternative energy implementation and research. It's going to cost a lot of money to get off Big Oil, and since Big Oil has made so many billions selling us crude for a hundred years, they should have to help pay for the shift to other energy sources. It's better for them (in the long run) and better for us in the short term.

Companies complain that they can't find qualified workers to fill jobs these days. As most people realize, education is good, but on-the-job training often produces better workers. Instead of complaining, corporations and large companies should institute aggressive hiring-with-training programs and stop their whining. They will fill their manpower needs more effectively, and put more people to work.

Try to cut back on two things whenever you can. Drive less, thereby using less oil, and buy more U.S.-made products. The oil deficit is our second highest trade deficit. Goods purchased from China are Number One.

Clint Eastwood may have touched on the spirit of America with his Super Bowl bit.

In any case, I think he and I agree on a few things.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: DemGuys, EconVine, Free Thinkers, Gut Check America, Heated Debate, Left of Center, Liberal Campaign, Living with Less, Mad For Rachel Maddow, MarsVine, Newsvine HONOR Vine, Newsvine Science, Northwest News and Views, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine, Old viners, Open Mic, Science & Space Gateway, Seattleites, The Truth Network, To MSNBC
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (22)
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Comments are welcome within the Code of Honor guidelines at Newsvine.

Hatred, racism, and name-calling are NOT allowed...and will be deleted without mercy.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 12:46 AM EST
Auto 101

Taxes on the rich should go up, while those on the middle class and the poor need to decrease.

I think taxes on both classes should go up. the rich can pay more and the middle class pays very little most take advantage of write offs this has brought our taxes down paid 5% and we make close to 100K. what do you want to bring it down to? 3%? 2%? Were not rich my wife is in the army and I am an Auto technician.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:37 AM EST
HappyConservative

The middle class pays very little? In case you haven't noticed, the middle class has paid more than it's share of the tax burden for the last 50 years. The middle class gets squeezed unmercifully compared to the tax burdens of the poor and the rich.

    #1.2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:07 PM EST
    mstanley2265

    Oh the poor get squeezed a bit more, taxes on utility bills for instance, sales taxes on products ...stuff like that. Registration fees for a car, insurance cost for a car, gasoline taxes for gas...lots of small ways that eat up any cash they have.

    • 1 vote
    #1.3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:22 PM EST
    HappyConservative

    Middle class has the same bills.

      #1.4 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:37 PM EST
      mstanley2265

      yes, and they have more cash to pay with if they have a job, but if not then they fall into the poor class with less cash. Thus, the heating and cooling assistance from the Feds, but they but that budget so either the states have to make up the dif, which they are, in the KY were I'm at, they increased the KY taxes on utilities. They yet to do any property tax increases but that'll have to come around too. They did cut back on the tax breaks and incentatives they give business's.

      • 1 vote
      #1.5 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:36 PM EST
      Nicey-1026620

      Even with all the college funding in the world, most Americans will finish their education as soon as they graduate high school. This mean our K-12 system needs to be the best it CAN be.

      While schools with more money has some impact, social stability is more important.

      In fact, Government spending at the college level has been disastrous for student tuition rates. As public universities are aware the money will be given, they continue to raise rates over and over.

      College Tuition has had highernflation than healthcare and gas *combined* in the last 20 years.

      The rising cost of energy is a serious drain on the economy. Two simple things here. The first country that goes green and becomes the primary manufacturer and producer of renewable energy WINS. That country is guaranteed a strong economy and plenty of jobs. Charity begins at home, though. This means Americans must do their part to cut back energy use.

      The price points simply aren't there.

      They still all require government subsidy to be competitive in the market place. Even the supposed Chinese greening isn't so, because they are simply manufacturing for other people. Given their inflation rates, they'd rather eat cheap energy than anything else.

      It's going to take all resources.

      And, oil *should* be as high as it is because it is forcing changes. Changes to peoples energy consumption, changes to efficiency on cars, and so on.

      If we don't keep up with the competition, it will be the Chinese, the European Space Agency, or even the Italian Space Agency who become the Keepers of the High Ground. With some governments, this might not be a good thing for America.

      Europe? I doubt it. They face some real severe demographic constraints. Let alone what's going on now with their debt issues. Italy? That's gonna be a definite non-worry.

      Taxes on the rich should go up, while those on the middle class and the poor need to decrease. No one envies those who achieve the American Dream. But if you can afford more, you should PAY more. To the Rich Folks: Don't worry, no one is suggesting you be taxed back to the Stone Age. Just pay your fair share to support a free country that made it possible for you to get rich in the first place.

      All taxes need to go up.

      Or, deductions have to fall.

      People (all of them) are too dependent on government subsidy. Now, proportionally, that's much higher at the top, but the government really works well if you're wealthy.

      But, we're all participants. I didn't see anyone giving back their 2001/2003 surplus tax cuts (that have had a severe impact on revenues).

      • 1 vote
      #1.6 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 10:27 AM EST
      Nicey-1026620

      I think taxes on both classes should go up. the rich can pay more and the middle class pays very little most take advantage of write offs this has brought our taxes down paid 5% and we make close to 100K. what do you want to bring it down to? 3%? 2%? Were not rich my wife is in the army and I am an Auto technician.

      5% on 100K joint income?

      Like to see that calc.

      Yes, your taxes should be higher. Me....I pay an *effective* rate of 16.87% on less income than that. Mine should probably be slightly higher too, but the problem is.....*will the government use the taxes in a way that benefits as many as possible across the society*

      I doubt they will.

        #1.7 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 10:30 AM EST
        Reply
        markpup

        I know a lot of wealth is getting scammed these days but it still begins with you - like the article says.

        I think the best place to start is to be financially responsible. Way way too many Americans these days buy things they don't need and go into debt for it. If you have cable and a smartphone and you have more than 3K in credit card debt you can't pay right off, you're the ones I'm talking about and I think I just covered over half the people out there just with that.

        When I was younger people didn't live this way. If you're not financially responsible yourself, you can't get down on the government for being the same way to be able to judge it you have to be an example.

        Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle great suggestions also but I think to get ourselves out of this deficit tailspin, even middle class taxes will have to rise some and we will need some pretty serious tax cuts on social spending (not social security) and defense. I'm pretty well off and I'm willing to help if everyone else does. And the rich rate should be at least 60% albeit with some great tax incentives for people who actually produce something it's way past time to reward productivity over just being lucky enough to have a lot of money.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:30 AM EST
        BD Styers

        Our trade deficit with China, the vast amount of U.S. currency we send to countries who don't even like us - simply to power our vehicles and way of life - this is the majority of the problem. Couple that with our lack of investment in education, both K-12 and college, and this is a recipe to become a second or third-rate country within a decade.

        Trade deficits occur through spending what we don't have. The common phrase is 'borrowing from our children'. I stopped using this term when I realized that in order to borrow, you must have a consenting lender. The truth is that children are not legal adults, cannot enter into contracts, and cannot consent to the deal. It would be more accurate to call it thievery.

        We invest plenty into a system of education that focuses primarily on standardized testing to assess its efficacy while ignoring physical evidence.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:56 AM EST
        oldfogey

        Mirror, mirror on the wall.......Good article, Robert.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#4 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:34 AM EST
        mstanley2265

        A fast changing world requires the ability of a society to keep up or progress. Without a government's ability to do so leaves the society in a lurch if not behind. We must have a government that not only believes in progress but is active in leading the way.

        Very good points made in this article, Robert, kudos. :)

        • 2 votes
        Reply#5 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:37 AM EST
        HappyConservative

        Robert, I agree with many of the points you laid out in this blog. Especially how shortsighted Obama has been with the space program. For as much as George W. Bush was villified, he had the foresight to put in motion the "Constellation" program which envisioned a return to the moon. Obama promptly cancelled that program and replace with his vision of venturing to the asteroids. In the meantime, China has made no secret of their plans to send astronauts to the moon. Obama has taken us from an achievable program with tangible future payback, to one that has no tangible payback. Obama's short-sightedness has left us with a significant gap on being able to return Americans to space without relying on the Russians. And, to further rub salt in the wounds, his short-sightedness is responsible for the massive layoffs not only on Florida's "Space Coast" but for sub-contactors all around the U.S., including ATK in my home state of MN.

          Reply#6 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 12:43 PM EST
          mstanley2265

          Since there are More planets out there then the moon, it is feasible to focus on the Long term rather then the short term. There are more possible habitable planets being discovered every year. Why overlook the potential of the universe and focus on the moon? The payback is finding out that earth isn't the 'lone planet' capable of life. Are we too wait until life somewhere else figures out space travel?

          The contractors need to refocus and retool to a new goal, going into outer space where there are other planets.

          • 2 votes
          #6.1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:04 PM EST
          HappyConservative

          We are many decades away from having the technology to send man out to any of the exoplanents that are being discovered almost weekly. That technology is in it's infancy stages and is prohibitively expensive. I encourage you to broaden your view by watching "Moon for Sale" on the Science Channel. Mining of Helium 3 on the moon for use in fusion reactors on Earth is an endevour that is ALOT closer to our grasp than sending astronauts to exoplanets light years away. A return to the moon and mining of it's resources would incur an nominal increase to the existing NASA budget. Venturing to exoplanets, aside from being currently impossible, would bankrupt the GDP of every nation on Earth and put us only baby steps ahead of where we currently are.

          NASA's contractors were retooling to a new goal: A follow-on manned vehicle for use in both low Earth orbit and returning to the moon.

            #6.2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:17 PM EST
            mstanley2265

            Oh, pshaw on the moon, there are a lot of countries wanting a piece of the moon. The long term goal should still be the Universe.

            • 2 votes
            #6.3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:23 PM EST
            HappyConservative

            OK mstanley2265. You're the expert. Let start writin' out those checks. You think we have a deficit now? Coincidently, do you want to be first on the list to ride on an untested rocket that is going to an asteroid, much less an exoplanent?

            • 1 vote
            #6.4 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:37 PM EST
            mstanley2265

            well, they better have something in case one of those bigger asteroids aims right at the earth, not like those haven't hit the earth before. /sarc

            Either the US gets refocused or the other nations will. It's like the oceans, who controls space will control a whole lot more than Space.

            Deficit, the taxes have to be upped anyway...why because there's that little bilateral clause that states that anything that goes into space, if it comes back down on earth...the nation (even if it was a private company in that nation) where it came from ..... pays the freight for any damage to another nation. It's not like the US has insurance to cover the cost well except for the taxpayer that is.

            It's in the details....First the program has to refocus for the longer goal. That doesn't require more than what is being done now. What Was costing the money was the constant ..let's go to the moon deal. Been there Done that. So to cut costs to refocus some of that money on the longer range, the moon deal was sliced.

            This is where I got some of my information:

            NASA has also canned the Constellation program, which included the Orion crew vehicle and Ares launch vehicles.

            "The fact that we poured $9 billion into an unexecutable program does not mean that we should pour another $15 billion after it," said one NASA staff member, "that's what I'd tell taxpayers."

            The International Space Station will now no longer be deorbited in the middle of this decade, but instead will be treated like a national laboratory to research materials and long-term human habitation in space.

            Over half of the planned budget for the next five years – roughly $7 billion will be spent developing technology for cheaper, extended-range space flight, including in-orbit fuel depots, closed-loop life support systems, and automated rendezvous and docking technology.

            and NASA It takes multiple disciplines to complete an interstellar space flight program. A project that has been ongoing for quite awhile. Now, it's being pulled together finally.

            • 1 vote
            #6.5 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:37 PM EST
            Reply
            mstanley2265

            reply jumped down cancelled.

              Reply#7 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:21 PM EST
              Castor Bridge

              This article is nonsense. To sum it all up; the horrible economy is not because of the current administration's failed policies. It is all your fault, not Obama's fault.

                Reply#8 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 1:41 PM EST
                BD Styers

                I think it's more about taking responsibility than looking for someone to blame.

                I voted for Obama, a mistake I have made repeatedly because I believe this one is going to be different. I fall for the speech writers' prose. My vote is for Ron Paul this time. Will I be fooled again?

                  #8.1 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:09 PM EST
                  Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

                  Castor Bridge says:

                  'This article is nonsense. To sum it all up; the horrible economy is not because of the current administration's failed policies. It is all your fault, not Obama's fault...'

                  I never said that. I made a few points on what can be done to IMPROVE the economy, education, and our standing in the world. I did not point blame about the current recession.

                  If you want the answer to that, you will have to do a lot of research. Bush was on watch for two terms. I would look there to start. There is a lot of debate about it, but one thing is certain: It's where we go from here that really matters.

                  Everyone makes mistakes, even governments. Whether you learn from them, move forward and do better...now that's the REAL test.

                  • 3 votes
                  #8.2 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 3:12 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Leave a Comment:
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                  FUN STUFF:
                  • Leaderboard |
                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                  • Top of the Vine |
                  • Newsvine Live |
                  • Newsvine Archives |
                  • The Greenhouse |
                  COMPANY STUFF:
                  • Code of Honor |
                  • Company Info |
                  • Contact Us |
                  • Jobs |
                  • User Agreement |
                  • Privacy Policy |
                  • About our ads
                  LEGAL STUFF:
                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com