Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's column >>

ROBERT BLEVINS - AB OF SEATTLE

Home Page
Reporter: 'Are you a mod or a rocker?' Ringo Starr: 'I'm a MOCKER...'
Articles Posted: 480  Links Seeded: 294
Member Since: 3/2007  Last Seen: 5/15/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

12 More Things That Will Become Reality By 2020

Sun Jan 3, 2010 5:03 PM EST
odd-news, north-korea
By Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

'North Korea will enter the global community'

The all-electric Ecostar Van. Image courtesy of the Ford Motor Company.

Vacuum vessel cutaway from the fusion project currently under development in France.

Famine kills 25,000 a people a day worldwide. This number is but a shadow of the future.

Criminals like Madoff are going to find that money and good lawyers don't always mean an acquittal or a slap on the wrist.

An Iraqi baby injured by an American bomb. From the Newsvine article An Idiot's Guide to the Real Motives of Terrorism.

Actress Leigh-Taylor-Young from the 1971 film Soylent Green playing the coin-operated game 'Computer Space'. ('Asteroids,' a similar game from Atari wasn't released until 1979). It predated Atari's Pong by a year. Computer Space was the first commercially-available videogame of any kind, first sold in 1971.

Honda's ASIMO robot. It has been in existence for over eight years now.

Advertise | AdChoices

Two years ago, this writer published an article for Newsvine called 12 Things That Will Become Reality By 2020. With the turn of the decade, it seemed reasonable to post up another dozen predictions. As a sci-fi writer, I enjoy trying to peer through the misty glass between us and the future, although sometimes I think the glass is smeared with Vaseline. It's a bit tricky.

1 - No More Dead Zones

By 2020, your cell phone and Internet access will operate almost anywhere you can see sixteen degrees of the sky, whether you are out in the middle of the Sahara Desert, or walking along the streets of Manhattan.

2 - North Korea Will Enter the Global Community

Kim Jong Il isn't going to live forever, although if he could will it by Official Order, he would certainly do so. He's already had at least one stroke, and it's unlikely he will make it into the next decade. After his death, hunger and suffering by the North Korean populace will force the new government to check into the Reality Hotel - and become an active member of the world community.

3 - POD Tech Will Surpass Offset Printing

There are two types of 'POD,' One is good (Print on Demand) and one bad (Publish on Demand). Print-on-Demand, the REAL 'POD,' is headed by industry-leader Lightning Source, and is rapidly catching up to old-fashioned offset book printing. Print-on-Demand is a system where books are printed and shipped as they are ordered by customers at Amazon, bookstores, wholesalers, libraries, and retailers. Until about 2001, most books and magazines were printed short-run using traditional offset presses. This also meant publishers and distributors had to use warehouse space to store all these books and magazines. With POD, this is no longer necessary. Eighteen months after Lightning Source opened their Milton-Keynes facility in London, they had printed and shipped more than eight million books and magazines. By 2020, the majority of print publications will be done in this manner. An added advantage to POD is that it levels the field between the Big Boys and the Small Presses. ('Publish on Demand,' often confused for POD, is where a company offers to publish your book for a fee. These are usually a ripoff.)

4 - Green Tech Will Be Completely Mainstreamed

This is an easy prediction, as demand for this technology is literally exploding and companies developing it are springing up everywhere. By the end of this decade, virtually every small electronic device will have a solar-recharge, hand-crank, or other power option that doesn't rely on throwaway batteries or a plug-in. Homes will be designed green from the start with both passive and active solar, wind turbines, or other clean generation as an integral part of the home. They will have a central control area, such as a special room in your garage, where you can monitor power usage between green and traditional power. You could compare this to how a hybrid car switches back and forth between the electric motor and the gasoline engine. In addition, gasoline-only cars will become a thing of the past. Ford Motor Company has already seen this coming. They are no longer funding any research-and-development on gasoline-only automobiles.

5 - The Distance Between the Haves and Have-Nots Will Increase

This is not good news, but is likely to happen. Since the early 1990's, the proliferation of upscale housing developments in America share some common traits. They often have one way in - and the same way out of the neighborhood. This isolates them from the rest of the local community. They often add a security guard box and a restrictive Homeowners Association to keep everyone in line. Although you wouldn't catch ME living in one of these gated prisons, they are (unfortunately) the future.

6 - True Fusion Power May Be Achieved

The idea of going to Mars or establishing a base on the Moon seem like difficult technological projects. But they pale in comparison to fusion. Over in France, several countries have a big project going called ITER, and they are chasing the rainbow of true fusion power. If successful, it means clean, unlimited, and safe energy for the planet. Unlike traditional nuclear reactors, fusion is neither dangerous nor radioactive. We should all hope they succeed, because out of all the predictions on this list, the successful development of fusion could free the world from the grip of fossil fuels once and for all. Simply put, fusion harnesses the same basic process as our Sun and creates more energy than it takes to run it.

7 - Famine

It took the entire length of human history until the year 1800 for the population on Planet Earth to reach one billion. Now we are adding another billion every fourteen years. This massive increase, coupled with global climate change, will undoubtedly cause more famine around the world. The only two ways to prevent this are population control and the development of more efficient power sources. Although the second item is going well, population control efforts are still minimal at best. Unfortunately, Nature will eventually take care of the problem on her own and this means starvation and suffering.

8 - White-Collar Crime Will Decrease

China is already taking harsh steps against what used to be slap-on-the-wrist and pay-a-big-fine stuff. And although taking people out and shooting them in the back of the head might be over the top, penalties are already increasing against white-collar crime worldwide. Public outrage against corporate criminals is reaching new heights, and governments are going to get tougher with the penalties. An early example could be Bernie Madoff, and he won't be the last.

9 - Terror Will Diversify Even More

Is there a 'College for Terrorism?' YES. It's called the Internet. Terrorist groups will continue to de-centralize themselves and operate more independently, relying on the internet for communications, discussions of targets, images meant to inflame, and to issue directives to loosely-knit memberships. The good news is that the historical record shows terrorism doesn't usually achieve its goals or have a long-term effect on world policy. The truth is they don't have the resources or the weapons. World efforts should be able to contain them as long as they don't get their hot little hands on a nuke. For a realistic explanation of how these guys really work, check the Newsvine article 'An Idiot's Guide to the Real Motives of Terrorism'.

10 - Business Travel Will Drop Significantly

As technology and virtual interaction becomes more prevalent, the need for human business travel will also lessen. There will still be business travelers, but far fewer in 2020 than now.

11 - Stunt Men Will Have Less Work in Hollywood

CGI technology ('computer-generated imagery') is already the norm in Hollywood. Entire films are being released that don't use a single human actor, except for blue-screen work and voice-overs. By 2020, most special effects will be done using CGI, as opposed to say...human beings and real explosives. The work of directors such as George Pal, (War of the Worlds, When Worlds Collide) Alfred Hitchcock, (The Birds) and Stanley Kubrick, (2001) will become real collector items.

12 - Household Robots That Work

Honda, with their ASIMO robot, is rapidly making an old dream possible: A real robot that can do chores around the house. At first, these devices will only be available to the rich, and then other companies will jump in and you'll be able to pick up one at your local Wal-Mart. After that, some bottom-feeder companies will probably offer up a more 'human' version that is capable of having sex with you. Don't blame the messenger for this last prediction - blow-up dolls have been around for years.

Whether any of these things come true, only time will be the judge.

Here are a few predictions from previous generations that did NOT come true:

'Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.' (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895)

'I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.' (Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943)

'There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home.' (Ken Olsen, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977)

'The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.' (Western Union internal memo, 1876)

'Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.' (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918)

'The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?' (David Sarnoff's associates, in response to his urgings for investment in radio in the 1920's)

'Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.' (New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work, 1921)

'Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?' (Harry M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927)

'Everything that can be invented has been invented.' (Charles H. Duell, commissioner, US Office of Patents, 1899)

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Heated Debate, Living with Less, Newsvine Community, Newsvine Science, Northwest News and Views, Old viners, Open Mic, Our Orwellian World, Seattleites, WashingtonVine, Worldviews
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (36)
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Comments are welcome within the Code of Honor guidelines at Newsvine.

Hatred, racism, and name-calling are NOT allowed, and will be deleted without mercy.

My mother reads this column, and she is a harsh taskmaster indeed. :)

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 5:06 PM EST
AdipicAcid

Robert, you could have added your Number 6 to the list of things that were previously predicted to "occur within the next decade or so" for the past three decades. We always seem to be "about ten years or so" away from real fusion power.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 10:26 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

AdipicAcid says:

'Robert, you could have added your Number 6 to the list of things that were previously predicted to "occur within the next decade or so" for the past three decades. We always seem to be "about ten years or so" away from real fusion power.'

You are right. But this time they're serious about it.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 10:59 PM EST
AdipicAcid

They were serious in 2000 too, and in 1990. Forgive me if I remain a skeptic. At this point, this has been promised essentially my entire working life, so I'm not going to believe it until the first commercial plant comes on line, and not sooner.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 6:14 AM EST
ruthlessmoose

the fusion power of the sun... and no one thinks that could be dangerous or radioactive? lol

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 12:58 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

ruthlessmoose asks:

'the fusion power of the sun... and no one thinks that could be dangerous or radioactive? lol'

I'm going to let you off the hook here, because your comment is common with a lot of folk who don't understand the fusion process. Fusion is nothing like running a nuclear reactor with control rods, nuclear fuel, and a containment vessel...something that is VERY dangerous. Even if there were some kind of fire or explosion, only a tiny amount of radiation, less than normal background radiation, would be released. Here's more from the ITER site:

'How safe is fusion? In a tokamak fusion device, the quantity of fuel present in the vessel at any one time is sufficient for a few seconds burn only. It is difficult to reach and maintain the precise conditions necessary for fusion; any disruption in these conditions and the plasma cools within seconds and the reaction stops, much in the same way that a gas burner is extinguished when the fuel tap is turned off. The fusion process is inherently safe; there is no danger of run-away reaction or explosion.'

The ITER complex in France is a model. Their goal is just to achieve fusion and keep it running with enough output to power the plant itself with a bit left over. If it works, then it will be the model from which more fusion plants can be built. And if fusion is successful, everything we now run by burning coal or oil...or by using nuclear power plants...can be switched to electricity easily.

  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 10:38 PM EST
ruthlessmoose

NEAT!

And robert... I'm glad you understood my comment was added from my almost non-existent understanding of fusion lol

  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 2:59 PM EST
Nofluer

Sorry. Cold fusion? Nope. Every fraud and charlatan in history has claimed this one. "I can make lead into GOLD!!! "Generate enough to keep the reaction going plus a little"? ROTFLMBO!!! TANFL! EVER!

And the "power of the sun" is HOT fusion - VERY hot. (Internal temps of our relatively cool sun are around 24 Million F, surface temp is about 10K degrees F, and the temp of the corona is around 2 Mil Degrees F. I fail to see what is "safe" about that. And it's VERY radioactive. And the Sun only "creates" iron (Fe #26) and below. It sure doesn't create any of the heavier metals. (Those require the temperatures and pressures of nova and super nova.)

  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 8:56 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

ruthlessmoose:

No problem. I didn't understand it either until I researched the ITER site on what they are doing.

Nofluer: Many of the smartest people on the planet are working in France at the ITER. The United States, as well as most of the other major countries, are currently funding the project and they are making serious progress. The site link above goes to their very thorough website. I suggest a visit. The difference between creating the plasma/fusion process on Earth and what happens inside our sun is also addressed very well.

For a simpler overview, you can check my previous article The Plain Folks' Guide to Plasma Power.

In any case, a lot of people thought the Wright Brothers would not make it off the ground, either...

  • 3 votes
#1.8 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 2:59 AM EST
Nofluer

Many of the smartest people on the planet bought into Anthropogenic Global Warming, too. I don't give a flying freak HOW many "smart" people buy this garbage. TANFL! Period.

BTW - Con men LOOK for "smart" people because they're easier to scam than we dummies.

  • 1 vote
#1.9 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:19 AM EST
ruthlessmoose

I can make lead into GOLD!!!

Oh come on... alchemy is easy... that fusion thing... THAT'S tricky

Nofluer... lemme guess.... we didn't land on the moon either lol

  • 1 vote
#1.10 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:23 AM EST
upswing

I can make lead into GOLD!!!

Isn't that the basis of the US foreign policy: fire a bunch of lead into a bunch of disposable foreigners, and then grab their (black) gold?

It's been pretty easy so far ...

  • 6 votes
#1.11 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:27 AM EST
ruthlessmoose

well... that's ONE way to do it... it's cheaper just to transmute it lol

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 12:18 PM EST
Reply
TheJonesGirl

Honda, with their ASIMO robot, is rapidly making an old dream possible: A real robot that can do chores around the house. At first, these devices will only be available to the rich, and then other companies will jump in and you'll be able to pick up one at your local Wal-Mart.

Just look at the Roomba...I remember when I was a kid thinking that a self-powered vacuum would be neat. Now it's a relatively inexpensive reality.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 5:13 PM EST
KGMO

Great more jobs being automated. Who will ever pay humans to do anything ever again? :P

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 9:45 PM EST
DSMc2gal

If it would make you feel any better, KGMO, I hear that the robots will all be made in Mexico, and then smuggled into the United States!

  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 9:04 AM EST
TheJonesGirl

Hey, if the job being automated is tedious housework, I'm all for it!

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 12:41 PM EST
Shawn [a.k.a. "Shadow"]

Great...even fewer chores for the kids to do around the house - now they'll NEVER feel like they need to help as it'll be all handled by R2D2.

  • 3 votes
#2.4 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 3:10 PM EST
Checkmate-983933

lol, Shawn. Nice. I kinda feel the same way.

  • 3 votes
#2.5 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 3:29 PM EST
Nofluer

KGMO #2.1

Great more jobs being automated. Who will ever pay humans to do anything ever again?

One of the reasons I never use the "self checkout" lanes at WalMart. They want to PAY me to do the checkout stuff by tacking a nice 5% or 15% discount onto the end of the register tape, fine. But I'll not be responsible for causing some poor person to lose (or not have) a job.

Same thing with "Zip plus 4" - I use the first 5, but not the rest and I hand write (cursive not print) the address so that the letter must be SORTED by a human being. I'm not opposed to "progress" but I don't consider unemployment for some at the expense of the mega-corps to be "progress." :-)

  • 4 votes
#2.6 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 9:13 PM EST
KGMO

Nofluer that's cool! I'll try to do that more. I do remember thinking when they put in those self service checkouts, there go more jobs out the door.

The problem is with gains in productivity surpassing the growth in demand for goods and services. We have more people than we need to do the countries business. The Government may have to consider lowering the retirement age to get more people out of the work force.

I don't see how the downward spiral of incomes is ever going to stop.

  • 2 votes
#2.7 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 9:50 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Nofluer says, in part:

'One of the reasons I never use the "self checkout" lanes at WalMart. They want to PAY me to do the checkout stuff by tacking a nice 5% or 15% discount onto the end of the register tape, fine. But I'll not be responsible for causing some poor person to lose (or not have) a job.'

Nofleur...not using the self-checkout lanes is an exercise in denial. Just SHOPPING at Wal-Mart guarantees thousands of people in the US remain out of work, since we all know a majority of the Wal-Mart inventory consists of cheap, imported goods. You are easing your conscience by using rationalization...you don't REALLY contribute to the problem because you don't use the self-checkout? Of course you do.

And admittedly, so do I. I also shop there occasionally.

So we are both guilty of helping increase the trade deficit.

  • 4 votes
#2.8 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 3:15 AM EST
Nofluer

Robt #2.8

Have you ever read the labels on the goods at the smaller, more expensive stores?

Guess what - cheap imported goods.

Why? Simply because the US manufacturing industry decided to NOT upgrade their plants and systems - they chose instead to stick that depreciation allowance in their pockets - while the Japanese and Chinese invested it in new, more efficient processes and machines. If you equalize production costs (in the US you'd use more automation, in China you'd use cheaper labor) the Chinese could NOT compete because of shipping costs and low quality, and because the American Worker is the most productive worker in the world.

Wanna buy some REALLY cheap houses? I hear there are a LOT of them in Detroit! Approximately 2/3 of the city is abandoned and the city is seriously considering just bulldozing the abandoned properties so that they don't have to provide city services to empty real estate. There's even an abandoned CATHEDRAL!!! Wow! Shopping at Wal-Mart didn't do that!

The US Auto industry did that - to themselves!!! I refuse to buy a new GM product. Why? Because they make CRAPPY CARS!!! I bought a new pick up in 1982. When it got 28,000 miles on the odometer, the cam shaft went out. The Regional GM "Customer Service" rep tried to tell me it was MY fault because I "used the wrong oil" (I used what was recommended in the owner's manual.) And while the Rep was trying to blame me, he knew full well that they had a consent agreement with the Feds on that very defect. WHY would I buy a new GM after they LIED to me and tried to CHEAT me after selling me CHEAP DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS?

Isolated incident? My father bought a new 1965 GM pickup - and when it started acting up while still in warranty, GM refused to replace the defective cam shaft. (Lobes were off 5 degrees.) When the engine finally blew up, just a few miles after the warranty was up, my father had to SUE them to get them to replace the engine. So we're not looking at an isolated incident - or a problem they had for just a little while. It's the long term institutionalized SCREW THE CUSTOMER business practices that killed GM. (Which is appropriate since IIRC it was GM that killed established cheap efficient light rail in SoCal so they could sell more buses. Now - THERE'S a good corporate citizen!)

And now GM has had a name change to Government Motors - and I have even LESS incentive to buy something that the government makes - because the government is even more screwed up than GM was!!! I expect them to switch to plastic body two cylinder cars any day now. They might even revive the car models made by the East Germans!!!

A HUGE percentage of the trade deficit is imported oil. Did you know that the big oil companies ship a lot of their oil to other countries for refining? Why? Because the "environmental" industry in the US has pretty much blocked the building of refineries in the US for a long time. And nuclear generating plants? Same thing.

Coal can be burned with a minimum of pollution now - it's cheap, and it's USA produced. But... welll... there's your environmental wackos again. California needs power - they have rolling brown-outs and black-outs every summer. Why? Because they don't allow power plants to be built there. Why is the electricity that is available there so EXPENSIVE? Because the environmentally CLEAN skies of California are kept that way by buying coal generated electricity from Texas and Arizona.

Wal-Mart? Don't try to blame me because America/Americans/the US Government has decided to shoot itself in the foot. I may have to deal with the pain, but I'm not the cause.

How stupid is America? Look at who got elected to the Presidency. A "pig in a poke". Dumb dumb dumb. And now we'll all have to put up with the lunacy that's coming out of Washington DC because of the stupidity of the American voters (With special dishonorable mention for the REALLY stupid people who live in San Francisco and the rest of Cow Lick Fornia.)

If you want to post 12 more things that will be reality in ten years, ignore the pie-in-the-sky it'll never happen BS like household robots (energy wasters) and the rest of the la la BS. Come down to the REAL world and look at the current trends. Like what kind of America will there be as a result of the election of the Obamanauts last year? More terrorism (because the Obama government is rolling over and exposing America's belly to the killers). More starvation because of the take-0over of the food industry by Big Ag and the energy industry (GM food REQUIRES oil intensive farming tech.) More homelessness because our economy will continue to shrink as the life is taxed out of it to pay for health care that no one but the rich and the members of Congress can get.

ie - Dude - you're a SF writer. Open your brain to the REAL world around you and see where we're headed. If there is pie in the sky today, it's made of something nasty and it's about to smack us all right in the face.

  • 1 vote
#2.9 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 10:07 AM EST
Checkmate-983933

Nofluer, I know someone going through car problems with a Ford right now. Same thing. They needed a catalytic converter, specifically from Ford, and it was guarranteed to last a liftime. 2 months later, it breaks, and Ford doesn't want to replace it. She spent $600.00 on it and is going to sue.

And the majority of stuff in stores come from other countries. Been to the Gap and Old Navy: I see Indonesia, Vietnam, China, etc. Went to Stop and Shop and bought apple juice. Apples from Mexico and Fiji. Does the US not produce apples? Why are we buying apple juice made from apples from other countries?

  • 1 vote
#2.10 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 12:26 PM EST
TheJonesGirl

The problem I have with Walmart is their treatment of employees--sure, Costco sells some of the same products and other products from China and the like, but they at least pay their employees a living wage, don't hold meetings upon hiring about applying for food stamps and other governmental aid that will be needed to supplement an employee's pay, don't try to cheat employees out of overtime and the like...Costco also provides benefits, even to part timers.

And sure, a person can come back with "well, go get a different job." First of all, that is difficult in this economy, especially for the less-skilled who comprise much of Walmart's employee base. And when Walmart has managed to chase off many of the other businesses that a person could have worked at--it's a mess.

  • 2 votes
#2.11 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 2:40 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

nofleur says in part:

'Come down to the REAL world and look at the current trends. Like what kind of America will there be as a result of the election of the Obamanauts last year? More terrorism (because the Obama government is rolling over and exposing America's belly to the killers)...'

I knew you would eventually come to the meat of the matter. You'll excuse me if I don't go there, since this article wasn't really political.

  • 2 votes
#2.12 - Thu Jan 7, 2010 3:26 AM EST
Reply
River-239955

The quotes from previous generations are just too cute. Thanks for posting them. :)

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 5:49 PM EST
common sense-353470

A great well written article, both amusing and informative. Thanks!

  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Jan 3, 2010 11:19 PM EST
MoCowgirl-1193719

It took the entire length of human history until the year 1800 for the population on Planet Earth to reach one billion. Now we are adding another billion every fourteen years.

Nature will eventually take care of the problem on her own and this means starvation and suffering.

It is so ironic that the result of innovations in medicine and food production could mean intense pain, suffering and death for the people who lived because of these innovations in the first place.


  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 3:05 AM EST
upswing

Interesting list.

I'm curious.

What do you think will happen to national sovereignty?

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Mon Jan 4, 2010 1:05 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

upswing asks:

'I'm curious.

What do you think will happen to national sovereignty?'

Oh, some borders will shift around, and they'll have to change those maps of Antarctica again because of the ice sheets melting...but other than that I see no big changes unless a major world war erupts.

  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 2:45 AM EST
upswing

Thanks for responding.

So you think we'll still have nations. per se ... Interesting..

  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 9:24 AM EST
ruthlessmoose

antarctica lol.... people are still laying claim to that chunk of ice?

  • 1 vote
#6.3 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 3:00 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

ruthless moose asks:

'antarctica lol.... people are still laying claim to that chunk of ice?'

Yes...and here's the hippest place in Antarctica. They have parties galore and a house band. Surprisingly, it's run by the Brits. Adventure Books of Seattle has approached the communications director, Andy Webster, about a possible book.

  • 4 votes
#6.4 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 3:06 AM EST
TheJonesGirl

oooh, fun book. Antarctica is on my visit at some point list.

  • 1 vote
#6.5 - Wed Jan 6, 2010 2:41 PM EST
Reply
Checkmate-983933

I have been saying this for almost two decades now:

"If they say 'the future is now,' then where the hell is my moving sidewalk?"

As for the robots, meh. I prefer to do things on my own, even if I hate it. I remember an episode of The Simpsons where the family moved into a high-tec house and Marge got bored because there was nothing for her to actually do to clean up in the hosue.

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Tue Jan 5, 2010 3:03 PM EST
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com