Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Religion
    • Travel
    • Environment
Visit Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's column >>

ROBERT BLEVINS - AB OF SEATTLE

Home Page
Reporter: 'Are you a mod or a rocker?' Ringo Starr: 'I'm a MOCKER...'
Articles Posted: 424  Links Seeded: 258
Member Since: 3/2007  Last Seen: 3/18/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Newsvine Tools
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site
{"contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

The Newsvine Ten Question Palestinian Poll

News Type: Opinion — Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:50 AM EST
world-news, israel, palestine, gaza, gaza-strip, palestinian
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Live Poll

Was Israel justified initially for attacking Gaza to stop rocket attacks?

  • Yes
    69%
  • No
    31%

Total Votes: 214

Live Poll

Should Israel stay in Gaza until the Hamas is completely driven out of power?

  • Yes
    50%
  • No
    50%

Total Votes: 213

Live Poll

Should Israel allow the Hamas government to remain, but force agreements from them to stop rocket attacks?

  • Yes. I don't mind Hamas in power if attacks stop
    55%
  • No. Hamas must go under any circumstances
    45%

Total Votes: 211

Live Poll

Once military force by Israel has subsided, should the Israelis offer the Palestinians a separate state?

  • Yes. Give them a country and be done with it.
    80%
  • No. Borders remain the same.
    20%

Total Votes: 206

Live Poll

Do you have an opinion on how to finally settle the 'Palestinian Question' once and for all?

  • Yes. I have an idea and I shared it below.
    27%
  • I have an idea but its not your business
    18%
  • I have NO idea how to fix this mess!
    36%
  • Don't care. Think most Palestinians are terrorists
    19%

Total Votes: 188

Live Poll

Should Israel help install the opposing party, The Fatah, as the new government over ALL Palestinians?

  • Yes
    19%
  • No
    54%
  • I support neither of these governments
    27%

Total Votes: 201

Live Poll

No matter how it ends, do you believe Israel should assist the Gaza population in recovery efforts, such as rebuilding, medical care, etc?

  • Yes
    54%
  • No
    10%
  • Only if the Palestinian govt recognizes Israel
    36%

Total Votes: 208

Live Poll

Do you think that Barack Obama will pressure the Israelis to finally create a true, independent Palestinian state?

  • Yes.
    36%
  • No. He will leave it mostly to Israel.
    64%

Total Votes: 198

Live Poll

If the Hamas is driven out of power, do you think the Israelis should just 'keep' Gaza permanently, such as they did with some territories after the Six-Day War?

  • Yes
    26%
  • No
    74%

Total Votes: 199

Live Poll

If not Barack Obama, do you believe the U.N. should put heavy pressure on Israel to create a true, independent Palestinian state?

  • Yes
    52%
  • No
    38%
  • Not sure
    10%

Total Votes: 208

advertisement

In a previous article, this writer tried to present an even-handed look at the past and current conflict between Israel and other Arab countries, which includes the Palestinians.

The invasion of Gaza is just another in a long series of battles between those who not only refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist, but would like nothing better than their utter destruction.

On the other hand, many say Israel has gone too far this time. Civilians in Gaza are suffering and dying as a result of the bombings and the ground attack. Is Israel justified in invading Gaza to stop rocket attacks? Or should they have continued to seek other avenues to peace?

Would those avenues have worked anyway? According to recent reports from before the Gaza invasion, a majority of Palestinians actually SUPPORTED the idea of a peaceful solution with Israel. Hamas continues to fire rockets into Israel, though. And this negates the idea of working out an agreement without violence.

This ten-question poll tries to take a deeper picture of opinion on the matter.

Answering the questions as honestly as you can will help develop this picture.

For more background on terrorism in general, (although it doesn't totally apply in THIS situation) readers could try my previous article from last year:

'An Idiot's Guide to the Real Motives of Terrorism'.

Related Articles
Flashback: Israel threatens to unleash 'holocaust' in GazaThe TimesSun Jan 426Comments
Don't Believe Every Pleasant Claim About Israel That You ReadLewRockwell.comMon Jan 52Comments
IDF shell kills Palestinian family of seven near Gaza City - Haaretz - Israel Newshaaretz.comMon Jan 50Comments
Israeli Tanks Fire on United Nations School; UN Says 30 Killed, 55 Woundedhaaretz.comTue Jan 61Comments
Israel as U.S. Mini-MeThe Huffington PostTue Jan 618Comments
{"contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Anti-War, Combating Racism & Xenophobia, Counterterrorism, DemGuys, Heated Debate, Left of Center, Open Mic, Seattleites, Worldviews
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (214)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":4666198,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

I know this is a volatile subject right now, but please try to stay within the guidelines of the Newsvine Code of Honor. Racism and hatred are not tolerated on this column.

Among other things, this means comparing Isrealis to Nazis somehow, or to claim that ALL Palestinians are terrorists.

Don't MAKE me send 'Guido'. (Mythical AB enforcer) You don't want THAT.

{"commentId":4666198,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 13 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:53 AM EST
{"commentId":4668634,"authorDomain":"RETLAW"}
RETLAW

I think that the only way to stop the constant war there is to take the Palestinians to another place.  They have kept up battles of too long.  Either genocide or removal, IMHO.

{"commentId":4668634,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"RETLAW"}
  • 12 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:05 AM EST
{"commentId":4672592,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
jimmy havok-596667Deleted
{"commentId":4672925,"authorDomain":"mightyblogger"}
Pacific Northwest Blogger

the Palestinians were there before the Israelis.  Why should they leave?  Perhaps the Israelis could leave instead...

There's the problem, whose history should the world believe?

My understanding is that Palistine was never a state or country, just a representation of Arabian's living among others also living in the area.

How is the state of Isreal legitimate?
A mandate by the league of nations, now the U.N. making it so.
How does that erase thousands of years of history?

Does the U.S. really support a state based on religion or just want access to military bases in the middle east?

Should the world go by the latest to control the land and call them owners?
Should the world go by the earliest settlers?

I don't support Isreal or Palistine, I don't know the truth, therefore I can't support either side... and trust me, there are many people like myself who don't know fact from fiction regarding the claims by either side.

It's at a point for people like myself who would lean towards throwing all of them out, razzing the land to make it permanently uninhabitable for anyone. We could make the entire area a landfill for the worlds pollution and waste and end all discussion of who has a right to the land... none of the leaders from either side seem to have any rational decision making processes. An eye for an eye leaves the world blind afterall.

If both sides are liars and neither side is willing to let go their ego and arrogance to live peacefully, then neither side is yet capable of being a player on world stage and should be treated like badly behaving children by the U.N. and nations. Neither side should get what they want.

{"commentId":4672925,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mightyblogger"}
  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 3:21 PM EST
{"commentId":4673140,"authorDomain":"indelible"}
indelible inc.

jimmy havok,

They were there before the Israelis? Really?

I didn't know that a people that called themselves "Palestinian" even existed before the 1940's. I was under the foolish assumption that modern day Palestinians would have grandfathers and grandmothers who think they're more Syrian or Jordanian than anything...I guess my Palestinian friends lied to me about their own relatives. I guess all those hours spent having tea and shisha with old Palestinians was just trickery and deception. I should knock on my 75 year old neighbor's door and ask him why he lied to me about being Syrian when his sons and daughter identify themselves as Palestinian because Syria or one of the other 22 Arab states (with plenty of room) won't take them.

I guess all that archeological evidence of Jews being in the land 2000 years before the Arabs even spread out is all just smoke and mirrors. I guess the historical evidence of David's Jerusalem is just biblical bull, because your real science proves Palestinians have been around even before then!

I guess you're just really wise about the subject. I'm sorry I got it all wrong all this time.

{"commentId":4673140,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"indelible"}
  • 9 votes
#1.4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 3:36 PM EST
{"commentId":4675140,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
Maxwell Despard

You're manipulating semantics. The land that is now known as Israel was slated to be Palestine. It was promised to them by England. They lived there. Then some people decided to give it to Jewish people instead. Even though it had been promised to the Palestinian people, whom already lived there.

But really, it doesn't matter. Is Israel would stop being @!$%#s to the Palestinians, groups like Hamas wouldn't seem so appealing. As it stands, blowing Palestinian people up again, all that will be accomplished is more anger toward Israel, which will make Hamas seem that much more "correct," in spite of the ways that they're screwing up.

Seriously, if people would just take a moment to stop believing things and think about it, divorce their preferences from logic, it's amazing what can be accomplished.

{"commentId":4675140,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 5:51 PM EST
{"commentId":4675221,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
jdoyle

They were there before the Israelis? Really?

Yes they were:

No population remains pure over a period of thousands of years. But the chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I are its descendents. The first Zionists, up until the Arab Revolt [1936-9], knew that there had been no exiling, and that the Palestinians were descended from the inhabitants of the land.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/966952.html

{"commentId":4675221,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 5:56 PM EST
{"commentId":4676674,"authorDomain":"irene498"}
Irene-498401

The Arabic language doesn't have a "P" sound or an "E" sound, here is an intro language link, so the name "Palestine" is confusing. 

{"commentId":4676674,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"irene498"}
  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 7:43 PM EST
{"commentId":4677463,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
Maxwell Despard

And Jesus' name wasn't really Jesus. Your point?

{"commentId":4677463,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:48 PM EST
{"commentId":4677550,"authorDomain":"fafhrd45acp"}
Fred F

Palestine is like Kwanza. Totally fictitious.

{"commentId":4677550,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"fafhrd45acp"}
  • 1 vote
#1.9 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:57 PM EST
{"commentId":4677970,"authorDomain":"irene498"}
Irene-498401

My point is that it is confusing.

Shouldn't we pronounce it Filistine? In which case, are they saying they are the Philisitines? And doesn't that derive from a Hebrew word that means 'immigrant.' Weren't the Philistines wiped out by the Babylonians or something?

I guess it's that they're the people who were living in the British Palestine Mandate, which would make them Palestinians, (or maybe British?) in the way that Canadians are from Canada. But there were quite a few Jewish citizens in British Palestine too. So, couldn't they be classified as Palestinians in the same manner?

Anyway, I'm sticking with my contention that it's confusing.

{"commentId":4677970,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"irene498"}
  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:35 PM EST
{"commentId":4680028,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
jimmy havok-596667Deleted
{"commentId":4680082,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
jfxgillis

jim-hav:

Actually, if memory serves, in the usage of  the period, the Jewish immigrants called themselves Palestinians while the Arabs called themselves Arabs.

Not that it matters. Or any of the rest of these idiotic pissing matches over "history."

{"commentId":4680082,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 7 votes
#1.12 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 1:48 AM EST
{"commentId":4680156,"authorDomain":"irene498"}
Irene-498401

It may be idiotic, but history and religion are totally relevant to understanding this issue because they both use it.

{"commentId":4680156,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"irene498"}
  • 5 votes
#1.13 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 2:03 AM EST
{"commentId":4680231,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
jfxgillis

Irene:

Believe it or not, I completely agree with you. Even more amazing, it's not a contradiction with what I said above.

To understand the Middle East, you have to learn everything you can about the history. To discuss it, you have to forget it all.

(Do you think I'd have known that little tidbit about the pre-Israel Jews being called Palestinians if I didn't know a good deal of the history?)

{"commentId":4680231,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 5 votes
#1.14 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 2:21 AM EST
{"commentId":4734633,"authorDomain":"EllieP"}
EllieP

Robert,

Interesting poll/results.  Oddly enough, I visited your overivew article (which I think is very good and have it clipped to my column, btw) this morning to ask you to review what I had found as an interesting new suggestion.  The proposed solution in contained in the comments of this seed.

{"commentId":4734633,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"EllieP"}
  • 7 votes
#1.15 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 1:16 PM EST
{"commentId":4743214,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
worldknightboy

What Ellie said!

{"commentId":4743214,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 5 votes
#1.16 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 9:20 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":4666369,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
Maxwell Despard

Hamas claims that they aren't responsible for the rocket fire.

There are sources claiming that Israel had this planned six months back.

Could well be a false-flag sort of thing. Or it could be provacateurs. Don't know for sure. Don't think most other people do, either, on either side of the issue. Intellectual honesty has been sorely lacking in the debate.

{"commentId":4666369,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
  • 12 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:17 AM EST
{"commentId":4694520,"authorDomain":"JStranahan"}
Jimster

The timing is interesting. Isn't it? Sort of between U.S, Presidents, I mean.

{"commentId":4694520,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"JStranahan"}
  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 10:18 PM EST
{"commentId":4695050,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
Maxwell Despard

What purpose could it serve? I find it hard to believe that the Israeli heads of state have a hard-on for killing Palestinians, and just wanted to get a good attack in before Obama started holding them (slightly more) accountable.

{"commentId":4695050,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    #2.2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:14 PM EST
    {"commentId":4928452,"authorDomain":"axxiz144"}
    Azzix

    Yea, that makes sense. Fire ~2000 rockets and mortars over the period of two years... that could only be the work of the IDF, because Hamas has never been caught in a lie.

    </sarcasm>

    {"commentId":4928452,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"axxiz144"}
    • 3 votes
    #2.3 - Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:31 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4666376,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    jfxgillis

    Robert:

    Only voted for a couple or three of your questions. I'll comment on this one:

    Should Israel stay in Gaza until the Hamas is completely driven out of power?

    I voted No because Israel should hollow out Hamas, then let Fatah finish the job. Whether that is by ballot or bullet is up to the Palestinians.

    {"commentId":4666376,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    • 9 votes
    Reply#3 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:18 AM EST
    {"commentId":4666445,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
    Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

    jfxgillis says in part:

    Should Israel stay in Gaza until the Hamas is completely driven out of power?

    I voted No because Israel should hollow out Hamas, then let Fatah finish the job. Whether that is by ballot or bullet is up to the Palestinians.

    I tend to agree here, although my hopes are for BALLOT, of course.

    {"commentId":4666445,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
    • 7 votes
    #3.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:26 AM EST
    {"commentId":4666527,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    jfxgillis

    Robert:

    I expect your hope will be dashed, but I hope I'm wrong.

    {"commentId":4666527,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    • 6 votes
    #3.2 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:41 AM EST
    {"commentId":4666544,"authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}
    Smiling Jack

    I think it's absolutely crucial that they not attempt to destroy Hamas, because the reality is they can't.  They can kill their soldiers and wipe out there ability to attack for awhile, but if they support Fatah, then they will essentially kill it.

    Israel is not popular in the Gaza strip, and any government which they support will be seen as a puppet government.

    {"commentId":4666544,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}
    • 14 votes
    #3.3 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:45 AM EST
    {"commentId":4668636,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    Maxwell Despard

    If they see to the complaints of the people in Gaza (aside from the "why aren't you all dead from jihad" people), more extreme groups like Hamas won't be as interesting. Israel needs to go out on a limb, change the playing field, if they have any legitimate hopes of outing Hamas.

    So long as life in Gaza is hell, groups like Hamas will be popular.

    {"commentId":4668636,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    • 7 votes
    #3.4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:05 AM EST
    {"commentId":4669315,"authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    rls8r

    Unless things have changed, as I understand it - there are two 'wings' of Hamas: the political wing and the paramilitary wing.  Do you suppose that it would be possible to 'disband' the paramiltary side of things and leave the popular 'political' side (which I understand is responsible for hospitals, etc.) in place?

    I'm still trying to get my head around these things.  I seem to be the only commenter on the 'Vine that isn't already an expert.  I'd appreciate help from other 'Viners - especially links to good, neutral, primary source information about the situation (not blogs or even media reports - which I find generally report rumors as facts).  Thanks.

    {"commentId":4669315,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    • 4 votes
    #3.5 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 11:12 AM EST
    {"commentId":4670478,"authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}
    Smiling Jack

    Part of the problem is that they were allowed to hold elections, and they voted Hamas into power.  So Hamas (so far) is the group running things, and they've been the ones attacking Israel.

    It makes the whole thing incredibly difficult to deal with.  I think what we are looking at here is Israel changing its mind about allowing them to run their own affairs.  What is really going to happen, is we are going back to permenant occupation.  And that really is a tragedy, because we're likely to continue hearing about fighting in the strip until say, the day I die.

    {"commentId":4670478,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}
    • 7 votes
    #3.6 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:40 PM EST
    {"commentId":4674681,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    jfxgillis

    rsl8r:

    there are two 'wings' of Hamas: the political wing and the paramilitary wing. 

    Invalid rationalization. I didn't swig that excuse when the I.R.A. and Sein Fenn tried to pull it in Ulster (and I was lot more sympathetic to Sein Fenn than I am to Hamas), and I'm not accepting it from Hamas, either. And especially since they wound up as the sovereign entity in in Gaza.

    They is who they is, holistically and throughout. Any other approach leads inevitably to an intolerable calculus, i.e. "X many murdered innocent Jews = Y many innocent Palestinian children ministered to."

    {"commentId":4674681,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    • 2 votes
    #3.7 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 5:17 PM EST
    {"commentId":4675062,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    Maxwell Despard

    But Smiling Jack, you missed the point: Hamas was elected due to a combination of coercion and the fact that life for the Palestinians really sucks, and Israel hadn't done much for them with Fatah. The legitimate support of Hamas is a direct result of the circumstances that Palestinian people live under due to Israeli policy.

    {"commentId":4675062,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    • 3 votes
    #3.8 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 5:45 PM EST
    {"commentId":4691144,"authorDomain":"denniswright"}
    Dennis M Wright

    Hamas claims that they aren't responsible for the rocket fire.

    Let's be as generous as we can to Hamas and assume that the actual firers are not card-carrying members of Hamas, just some other Palestinians in Gaza who hate Israel.

    Who's in charge of Gaza if not Hamas?  They won the election, then abandoned democracy, staged a coup to eject Fatah.  Any which way, they're the government.

    There are some folk on their turf firing missiles at a neighbouring nation, stirring up a military conflict and they wash their hands of all responsibility.  "It wasn't Ahmed, it was Abdul! Don't know him - nothing to do with me"

    If some cranks were firing missiles out of Canada into the US and the Canadian government sat back, doing nothing, saying "nothing to do with me" ...

    Would that wash? Seriously!

    {"commentId":4691144,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"denniswright"}
    • 4 votes
    #3.9 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 5:44 PM EST
    {"commentId":4691424,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    Maxwell Despard

    Well, we didn't invade Saudi Arabia after 9/11, so you tell me.

    {"commentId":4691424,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    • 3 votes
    #3.10 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 6:05 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4666494,"authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
    Mystic Chick

    Hamas definitely has to go. I think Israel is sending Hamas a very strong message right now. I'm in agreement with Jack on the Fatah issue. I don't necessarily trust Fatah, but they're a darn sight better than Hamas, that's for sure!

    I would support a separate Palestinian state, so long as the Palestinian government will recognize Israel and will NO LONGER attempt to destroy Israel. That crap just has to stop. If the installed government will recognize Israel's right to exist, and if it will strictly punish any of its citizens who conspire and/or attempt to blow Israelis to smithereens, I think there could be a workable situation on the table.

    Now we just have to wait and see if hell is going to freeze over or if the Christian armageddon is upon us. ::shakes head and chuckles softly:: What a world... What a world.

    {"commentId":4666494,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
    • 15 votes
    Reply#4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 1:35 AM EST
    {"commentId":4666759,"authorDomain":"melonhead"}
    urbane gorilla

    It's not up to Israel to "create" a Palestinian state.  Here's something to ponder: Arafat was always threatening - for lack of a better word - to declare a Palestinian state, and never did.  I have said it before, while the "land for peace" rubric is usually used only in terms of Israel giving up land for peace; it actually goes both ways, since Israel & the Palestinians have overlapping (to say the least!) claims. Once the Palestinians declare a state - let's assume a more-or-less pre '67 war borders - they will have  both staked an relinquished a claim in taking less than 100% of what lies between Jordan & the Mediterranean; this is  exactl ywhat no Palestinian leadership can or will do.

    {"commentId":4666759,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"melonhead"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#5 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 2:33 AM EST
    {"commentId":4667086,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
    jimmy havok-596667Deleted
    {"commentId":4668713,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    Maxwell Despard

    Nah, Arafat was legit. He could have had peace, but he knew it would pretty much be his last act. He didn't have the courage to martyr himself in the name of peace. But puppet? I'm not so certain about that.

    {"commentId":4668713,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    • 6 votes
    #5.2 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:14 AM EST
    {"commentId":4672635,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
    jimmy havok-596667Deleted
    {"commentId":4675153,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    Maxwell Despard

    It's entirely plausible, but I don't know. Not sure if that's the kind of thing that could be verified.

    {"commentId":4675153,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 5:52 PM EST
    {"commentId":4680047,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
    jimmy havok-596667Deleted
    {"commentId":4691192,"authorDomain":"denniswright"}
    Dennis M Wright

    Even Hamas made that offer, but were rebuffed by IDF helicopter gunships.

    They offered a 10 year truce, without recognition of Israel.  A deal to really grab at!  And what would they be doing for 10 years while Israel was constrained from stopping them?  Not arming up for a war on Israel, surely?

    {"commentId":4691192,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"denniswright"}
    • 4 votes
    #5.6 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 5:48 PM EST
    {"commentId":4710585,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
    jimmy havok-596667Deleted
    {"commentId":4711933,"authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    rls8r

    Hamas offered a hudna.  There's a bit more to a hudna than 'truce'.  See, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudna or http://www.meforum.org/article/1925 where it states:

    "Should a Muslim victory seem remote, the caliph could declare a truce in the interests of the umma. Rudolph Peters, Islamic law professor at the University of Amsterdam states, "According to some schools of law, a truce must be concluded for a specified period of time, no longer than ten years." Hanafi law, however, permits the Muslims to terminate a truce arbitrarily: The "imam may denounce the armistice whenever the continuation of warfare is more favorable for the Moslems than the continuation of peace," he continues. Such a truce is necessary when the Muslims are weak relative to their enemies. It can also occur when there is fitna within an Islamic state. These truces serve as protection against further violence to enable Muslims to regroup and gather their strength, whereupon they can issue a fresh declaration of jihad." [footnotes in original removed for clarity.]

    {"commentId":4711933,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.8 - Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:48 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4666810,"authorDomain":"ktmartin"}
    Karmart

    Hamas is getting weaponry from someone, right? They are being funded somehow.  Who is funding and suppling rockets to Hamas? Isn't it vitally important to know the source of these arms? If we know who is funding and supplying this military effort we'll know who is behind the efforts to create conflict in the region. If it is Iran and/or Syria, which a good number of experts agree on, then there is obviously a more serious matter involved here than just working out a peace agreement with Hamas.

    Iran is a major influence in the region. It is suspected they are close to developing nuclear weapons. They presently have capability of long range missiles; something which Israel considers a serious threat to their existance. This Palestinian/Israeli issue is bigger than what appears on the surface. It could blow up (literally) into a major Middle East war if not handled diplomatically. The US can help but will need the cooperation of other powers such as Russia (which is not very likely) and perhaps China who many respect as a growing superpower, militarily and economically. Pressure needs to be put on Iran and Syria to stop funding terrorism.

    I believe there is hope for peaceful existance, but it will be very challenging, especially for the Obama administration. I know they will want to get this issue resolved before it becomes a full blown war in the region. An Israeli-Iranian war would benefit no one and could lead to mass destruction in the Mid East. One thing for certain, time isn't going a favourable factor. It is running out. The patience of the Israeli govrnment has run out as evidenced by the actions in the Gaza strip. I don't know how far they will go to ensure rockets no longer attack innocent civilians in Israel. I'm not sure we want to see where this could lead if diplomatic intervention isn't taken very soon.

    {"commentId":4666810,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"ktmartin"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#6 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 2:45 AM EST
    {"commentId":4667143,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
    Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

    Yes, it could lead to full-scale war. In this catastrophe, Israel is able to defend itself but as we all know the scenario has no real winners.

    An excerpt from When Village Idiots Become World Leaders, Nuking the Planet Becomes a No-Brainer:

     '...in the event that (Iran) decides to drop the Big One on Israel using one of their new missiles, you can be assured the the Israelis will retaliate in force. Israel is fairly tight-lipped on their nuclear capabilities, but has had an active nuclear weapons program since the mid-1950's. It is estimated they possess between 100-200 nuclear weapons. Israel DOES have a space program using their main launch vehicle, the Shavit. Their Jericho-2 rocket, developed in the 1970's, has an estimated range of 1,500-2,500 kilometers, and it is believed they now have a Jericho-3 rocket with a 4,500 kilometer range.'

    {"commentId":4667143,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
    • 4 votes
    #6.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:36 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4667002,"authorDomain":"martinez"}
    MartinEZ

    If there is to be peace, one of the two side will have to be obliterated, and even at that, it only took 19 people to stir the US into two wars... There is no 'real' or ethical solution to this problem. You don't solve 2000+ years of strife with a pen or a sword.

    {"commentId":4667002,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"martinez"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#7 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 3:43 AM EST
    {"commentId":4667088,"authorDomain":"eel8"}
    eel8

    I tend to think the only solution will be when Armageddon occurs.

    {"commentId":4667088,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"eel8"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#8 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:09 AM EST
    {"commentId":4667155,"authorDomain":"jhavok"}
    jimmy havok-596667Deleted
    {"commentId":4667269,"authorDomain":"mikelmiller4444-1"}
    mikelmiller4444-1Deleted
    {"commentId":4667794,"authorDomain":"markthemuse"}
    Mark The Muse

    I guess the people of Gaza are learning a painful lesson in democracy.

    According to recent reports from before the Gaza invasion, a majority of Palestinians actually SUPPORTED the idea of a peaceful solution with Israel.

    They either should have actually gone to the ballot box, or if  they did vote, cast their ballot differently.

    {"commentId":4667794,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"markthemuse"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#11 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:17 AM EST
    {"commentId":4668148,"authorDomain":"ombra"}
    ombra

    The funny thing about elections is when one party doesn't make things any better for the people, they tend to vote for the other party.

    Hamas won the election because of Israel's policy of not making things better for the people. The settlements continued to grow, doubled in size in ten years, and the status quo was mostly maintained. Things didn't get better. 

    {"commentId":4668148,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"ombra"}
    • 5 votes
    #11.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:10 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4668507,"authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    TarchonTheEtruscan

    The only thing to go should be the Jewish entity in occupied Palestine and mercifully they should take their epic (the Hebrew Bible) with them.

    Ethnic cleansing, daily humiliations and deprivations are a thousand time more terroristic than stone throwers.

    {"commentId":4668507,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#12 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:52 AM EST
    {"commentId":4669166,"authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
    Mystic Chick

    Now now, Tarchon, why don't you give everyone the full story. You wish the same dismal end to followers of the Islam too. You said so yourself at the tail end of this seed.

    I really don't understand how someone could harbor such ill-will towards all followers of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. It truly boggles the mind.

    {"commentId":4669166,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
    • 3 votes
    #12.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:57 AM EST
    {"commentId":4669732,"authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    TarchonTheEtruscan

    Beliefs in lies that destroy lives should not be tolerated any more. Humanism, stoicism, hepicurism, buddhism, confucionism, etc... take your pick.

    {"commentId":4669732,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    • 2 votes
    #12.2 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 11:49 AM EST
    {"commentId":4673657,"authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    rls8r

    Don't forget cynicism.

    {"commentId":4673657,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
    • 3 votes
    #12.3 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:09 PM EST
    {"commentId":4676815,"authorDomain":"irene498"}
    Irene-498401

    But, Tarchon, while I agree that the world religions have some serious problems, acting on your suggestion would destroy lives too.

    It would also be impractical to expect everyone to suddenly give up their religion or that we would all live happily ever after-- in any circumstance.

    {"commentId":4676815,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"irene498"}
    • 2 votes
    #12.4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 7:54 PM EST
    {"commentId":4678129,"authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    TarchonTheEtruscan

    Keep the pomp and circumstances but get rid of the Hebrew Bible. The New Testament being mostly Greek is almost OK just cut the Old Testament baggage.

    {"commentId":4678129,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    • 2 votes
    #12.5 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:51 PM EST
    {"commentId":4680118,"authorDomain":"irene498"}
    Irene-498401

    Tarchon, it's just that people don't work like that. It's not possible for everyone to agree to get sensible and pick out the 'good' parts of the bible. It's seldom possible to get a group of people to agree on pizza toppings, let alone rewriting three major religions.

    {"commentId":4680118,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"irene498"}
    • 1 vote
    #12.6 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 1:55 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4668546,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
    jdoyle

    Israel is going to have to do something to undue the mess they have created.

    They have caused mass suffering and committed mass murder.

    Israel has gotten away with stealing land setting up an apartheid system and murder.

    For years they could get away with it because they had the blind support of the US and Europe, however this is changing. People here and in Europe are seeing through the Israeli lies and as more documentation come out of the war crimes being done, the support of Israel will erode.  Even Condi Rice who is no friend of Islam has condemned the stealing of more land to make room for more settlers.

    Israel will have to begin to change their polices of human rights abuses if they want any cooperation, and will have to start in Gaza.

    {"commentId":4668546,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#13 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:56 AM EST
    {"commentId":4668681,"authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    TarchonTheEtruscan

    I agree but I am in favor of a one state solution.

    {"commentId":4668681,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
    • 3 votes
    #13.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:10 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4670111,"authorDomain":"pakmanjonzun"}
    thomrob

    "Don't care. Think most Palestinians are terrorists"

    This would have been my choice without the second part.

    "No. He will leave it mostly to Israel."

    Also the second part of this one seems misleading to me. He wont do anything, because he needs the pro-israel lobbies. And he'll be putting extra effort into countering peoples fears about the ethnicity of his name.

    {"commentId":4670111,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"pakmanjonzun"}
      Reply#14 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:17 PM EST
      {"commentId":4670281,"authorDomain":"pakmanjonzun"}
      thomrob

      Neat poll though, that was fun.

      You should do more.

      {"commentId":4670281,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"pakmanjonzun"}
      • 1 vote
      #14.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:27 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4670718,"authorDomain":"UNCLEMIKE"}
      UNCLEMIKE

      Take a look at the statistics on this site.  It is is a breakdown by an Israeli Peace Organizaton of casuaties in this conflict since 2000.   The Palestinian children killed to Israeli children is the opposite of what has been reported in the American Press.  I'd encourage all of us to take Robert Blevins' guidelines to heart and look at the numbers.   Demonizing one side or the other has just worked wonders in terms of turning this conflict into a perpetual murder machine.   Maybe it's time to take a different direction, starting with our own preconceptions. 

      http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties.asp

      {"commentId":4670718,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"UNCLEMIKE"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#15 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 12:55 PM EST
      {"commentId":4674382,"authorDomain":"restless-shadows"}
      Andromeda-510639

      Let the people decide, the common, everyday folk, and I believe that peace will be the path of choice.  Leave it to the region's leaders, and as witnessed here, the situation gets messier and harder to manage.

      {"commentId":4674382,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"restless-shadows"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#16 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 4:54 PM EST
      {"commentId":4675342,"authorDomain":"jhynde"}
      John Hynde

      With all do respect Mr. Blevin, I noticed that one of the answer options of your "poll" was "I don't care, all Palestinians are terrorists". Yet you want your readers to stay within the Newsvine "Code of Honor".

      How about rephrasing that answer option into: "I don't care, the Israel is a terrorist state and always has been"

      IS THAT WITHIN THE CODE OF HONOR FOR YOU or will you do a GUIDO now ???

      {"commentId":4675342,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jhynde"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#17 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:05 PM EST
      {"commentId":4677549,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
      Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

      John Hynde says:

      'With all do respect Mr. Blevin, I noticed that one of the answer options of your "poll" was "I don't care, all Palestinians are terrorists". Yet you want your readers to stay within the Newsvine "Code of Honor".

      How about rephrasing that answer option into: "I don't care, the Israel is a terrorist state and always has been"

      IS THAT WITHIN THE CODE OF HONOR FOR YOU or will you do a GUIDO now ???'

      Yeah...you are right about this. After I posted up the poll question I wondered whether I should have phrased it that way. Unfortunately, once you enable a poll question you can't change it. I would delete the question, but then all the votes would disappear as well.

      I guess we could call it an outlet for the hard-core folks. One caveat though: It doesn't say 'All Palestinians are terrorists.' It says 'I THINK all Palestinians are terrorists.' It's a small difference, I know. I suppose if I could do it over I would change that option, though.

      Wait...I hear a knock at my door.

      Uh, oh.

      It's Guido. Got to go...

      {"commentId":4677549,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
      • 4 votes
      #17.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:57 PM EST
      {"commentId":4679619,"authorDomain":"ktmartin"}
      Karmart

      John,

      Although you've made a good point, I'm not convinced that the view of Palestinians should have been excluded, in order to get a feel for how "we" view the issue. However in fairness and to balance the scales, as you suggested; the question of an Israeli terrorist state could have also been included (if for nothing more than keeping the politically correct cops from pulling out their batons).

      By the poll numbers above,  it looks like there are a fair number of voters (19% now) who perceive Palestinians as supporters of terrorism. It would have been interesting to see what the numbers would have been if the question read something like I don't care "Israel is a Terrorist State" was added.

      Just my "uncensored" view.

      {"commentId":4679619,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"ktmartin"}
      • 1 vote
      #17.2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 12:32 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4675376,"authorDomain":"palmasel"}
      Maria-789794

      Just stop the occupation and the harassment, give them their land and let them have a dignified life. Once they have work, food and education there will be peace. Let them be free

      {"commentId":4675376,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"palmasel"}
      • 7 votes
      Reply#18 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:09 PM EST
      {"commentId":4675569,"authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
      TarchonTheEtruscan

      a voice of reason.

      {"commentId":4675569,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEtruscan"}
      • 3 votes
      #18.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:23 PM EST
      {"commentId":4675607,"authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      Mystic Chick

      Just stop the occupation and the harassment, give them their land and let them have a dignified life. 

      They don't just WANT land, Maria! Hamas wants Israel's total destruction! Hamas wants to kill all the Jews in Israel.

      And Tarchon: HUSH.

      {"commentId":4675607,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      • 5 votes
      #18.2 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:26 PM EST
      {"commentId":4675776,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
      jdoyle

      They don't just WANT land, Maria!

      Yes they do; they want the land stolen by invading Zionists from Europe.

      {"commentId":4675776,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
      • 6 votes
      #18.3 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:39 PM EST
      {"commentId":4676993,"authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      Mystic Chick

      jdoyle: Hush.

      {"commentId":4676993,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      • 2 votes
      #18.4 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:09 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678130,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      Behind My Screen

      in 1946, Palestinians had the entire northern region of what is now Israel and the west bank. Prior to this, they had no state and were a second class people in the Kingdom of Jordan.

      The Palestinians got huffy with Israel because the Palestinians thought they should have full control of the entire region, even though they lived a nomadic life prior to the formation of Israel and Palestine, and we poorly treated by their host countries.

      Palestinians started the mess, the Arabs and Russia perpetuated the mess, and now the Extremists on both sides find themselves fighting over a the metaphorical "pig" that died generations ago.

      {"commentId":4678130,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      • 3 votes
      #18.5 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:51 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678232,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
      jfxgillis

      BHS:

      Extremists on both sides find themselves fighting over a the metaphorical "pig" that died generations ago.

      And an especially inapt metaphor that is for a fight featuring Jews and Muslims!

      {"commentId":4678232,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
      • 4 votes
      #18.6 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 10:00 PM EST
      {"commentId":4695028,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      Behind My Screen

      I was aware of the issue with the Kosher/Hillal issues, I was simply making an allusion to the Hatfeilds and Macoy's of the American 19th century. By the end of the feud, no one knew why they started fighting, just that they hated the other side.

      {"commentId":4695028,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      • 2 votes
      #18.7 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:11 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4675906,"authorDomain":"fsomsel"}
      VoiceOfReason-798433

      There is a simple solution to peace between Israel/Palestine and it is an easy process to start.

      As soon as this current violence subsides, the Israelis should offer up a compensation fund for the Palestinian refugees in exchange for giving up the "right of return".  They should offer up some amount - say $5 billion as a starting point to the negotiations.

      The number will end up being higher and perhaps Europe and America could contribute in the name of peace.  However, once someone steps up and negotiates this settlement on the side of the Palestinians (and it gets the seal of approval from the UN and perhaps a few key Arab countries), then anyone that says that Israel does not have a right to exist will be marginalized.  This will have the effect of taking the air out of the extremist side.

      The offer itself is enough as it will force Palestinians to debate and decide, very publicly, between taking money in exchange for peace OR committing to driving the Jews out of Israel. 

      If they won't take a settlement - which is a better offer than refugees from other countries would get, especially after 60 years - then it will turn world opinion against the Palestinians.

      If they do take a settlement then it will prove that there are agreements to be reached and there is an actual chance of a long term peace.  In fact, I would be willing to bet that within 2 years of a settlement with the refugees, Israel would have a peace agreement with the Palestinian Authority and the Golan Heights will belong once again to Syria.

      {"commentId":4675906,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"fsomsel"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#19 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 6:49 PM EST
      {"commentId":4676245,"authorDomain":"TheEarthIsTheLORDs"}
      Not by might, nor power

      "Hamas definitely has to go. I think Israel is sending Hamas a very strong message right now. I would support a separate Palestinian state, so long as the Palestinian government will recognize Israel and will NO LONGER attempt to destroy Israel. That crap just has to stop. If the installed government will recognize Israel's right to exist, and if it will strictly punish any of its citizens who conspire and/or attempt to blow Israelis to smithereens, I think there could be a workable situation on the table."--Mystic Chick

      I wholeheartedly agree with every word.

      "They don't just WANT land, Maria! Hamas wants Israel's total destruction! Hamas wants to kill all the Jews in Israel."  -Mystic Chick

      This is a truth that is overlooked or purposely ignored by most, for example jdoyle who posted @ 17.3, and never even once mentioned Hamas' terrorist aim to destroy Israel.

      "I really don't understand how someone could harbor such ill-will towards all followers of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. It truly boggles the mind."   -Mystic Chick

      Isn't it ironic?  People who harbor such ill-will toward the religious, think themselves to be infinitely superior to them because of their hatred for them.  Satanic really.

      "Now we just have to wait and see if hell is going to freeze over or if the Christian armageddon is upon us"  --Mystic Chick

      Aw, Mystic now you almost sound like one of them.  Also, it isn't the Christian Armageddon, but the Jewish Armageddon.  It takes place in Israel.  It's mentioned in the Old Testament to the Jews.  In Daniel and Zechariah and other Old Testament prophets.  True Christians won't even be a part of it.

      Love, NBMNP!

      {"commentId":4676245,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"TheEarthIsTheLORDs"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#20 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 7:11 PM EST
      {"commentId":4677100,"authorDomain":"tang"}
      Calvin Tang

      This is a great poll, thanks for showing us what the Newsvine community thinks of the state of the Israel/Palestine conflict.

      {"commentId":4677100,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"tang"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#21 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:19 PM EST
      {"commentId":4677539,"authorDomain":"sharonmiller365"}
      Tsabarit

      Israel stands as a beacon of liberty in a sea of hatred.

      ISRAEL WILL PREVAIL!

      {"commentId":4677539,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"sharonmiller365"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#22 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:56 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678047,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      Maxwell Despard

      That's helpful. Thanks for this stellar contribution to the conversation. Beats the hell out of the mindless propaganda we've been seeing so much of lately.

      *cough*

      {"commentId":4678047,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      • 3 votes
      #22.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:42 PM EST
      {"commentId":4695983,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
      worldknightboy

      Tsabaritt, that is true! Still, islamic terrorism must be decisively crushed, and the sooner the better! Eventually in the fairly near future, the ayatollahs in Iran will similarly realize too late- like the terrorist group hamas, or whats left of it, is currently realizing- that they miscalculated badly. Friends request sent!

      {"commentId":4695983,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
      • 3 votes
      #22.2 - Wed Jan 7, 2009 1:38 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4677580,"authorDomain":"fafhrd45acp"}
      Fred F

      Palestine is like Kwanza. No such thing.

      {"commentId":4677580,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"fafhrd45acp"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#23 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 8:59 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678071,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      Maxwell Despard

      Kwanzaa exists. Has existed since 1966. If you're implying that its lack of "tenure" somehow makes it not exist, then Israel exists even less than Palestine.

      Do you have anything relevant, insightful, and/or helpful to add?

      {"commentId":4678071,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      • 4 votes
      #23.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:45 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4677600,"authorDomain":"trevycas"}
      Trevor Ycas

      Why the Palestinians?

      The Palestinian people have been imprisoned since the internationally questionable Israeli actions decades ago. An entire generation of Palestinians has grown up without a nation, without an identity, and without freedom (or some reasonable equivalent).

      Why the Fighting?

      With regards to the recent violence in Gaza, to accuse the imprisoned Palestinians of ’starting it all’ is blatantly unfair, because such a viewpoint can only be maintained if the generation-scale imprisonment is ignored. Although there are few parallels to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, any time and any place that millions of people are deprived of the right to govern themselves, the right to travel, the right to basic necessities, the rights to safety and the right to dignity, they will struggle. Dare to contain such a group of people inside a giant concrete fence against the ocean and they will resort to actions no one would normally consider defensible or appropriate. Thus the vicious cycle of violent resistance and violent retribution begins.

      What to Do?

      Until the root issue, the right to self-governance for the Palestinians, is addressed, this cycle will continue. As prisons are usually unsafe, so shall be Gaza and the West Bank whilst the concrete walls still stand. Therefore, with regards to ‘who started it all’, the roles of captor and prisoner must be examined. This consideration will ultimately provide a safe, secure, peaceful situation for all peoples in the region.

      {"commentId":4677600,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"trevycas"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#24 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:01 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678153,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      Maxwell Despard

      This. So much this. Thank you.

      To add, the position of Hamas as the dominant party in Palestine is the direct result of the perpetuation of these circumstances. Fatah was doing a whole lot of nothing to change the circumstances, so the people tried the party that would fight a little harder for them. There's also reason to believe that there was undue coercion involved; threats of violence and such to garner votes. While this doesn't necessarily excuse the deaths of innocent people at the hands of Hamas, it certainly explains it. Hamas has its own agenda, which they further by exploiting the plight of the Palestinian people. Address the issues as Trevor puts forth, help with the construction of an autonomous infrastructure, and Hamas will lose favor, as they will be seen for the opportunistic troublemakers that so many of them are.

      The deaths at the hand of Hamas need mentioning, but so do the circumstances that led to the position / actions of Hamas. Perpetuating those circumstances, continuing military excursions, will only create more problems. History pretty much proves this.

      {"commentId":4678153,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      • 4 votes
      #24.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:53 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4678076,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      Behind My Screen

      The UN created Israel, the UN can create Palestine.

      Give palistinians the west bank, give Egypt the Gaza strip and  be done.

      {"commentId":4678076,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#25 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:46 PM EST
      {"commentId":4695991,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
      worldknightboy

      Works for me!

      {"commentId":4695991,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
      • 4 votes
      #25.1 - Wed Jan 7, 2009 1:40 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4678215,"authorDomain":"karenselfridge"}
      crazy-798557

      I'm the first to admit all this makes my head spin, but am I to understand that there is proof that Syria and/or Iran is supplying Hamas?  With Israel backed by the US, this sounds like a warm up between Iran and the US.  I strongly agree that Hamas seems to have no interest in peace and also seem to be using their own people to hide amongst, knowing the bloodshed they are causing them.  If they ( Hamas ) are so sure that what they are doing is right, why not take their war away from the densely populated areas of Gaza, and take on Israel at the border.  Because they know they would loose man to man.? So they hide in among women and children and cry foul when a bullet meant for them hits the teenager they are hiding behind.

      Anyway, that sounded like a rant, and I'll repeat I have no real knowlege of the history between these two embattled neighbours or a clue how to make everyone involved happy. It just SEEMS Hamas will never recognise Israel's right to exist, let alone give them any peace.

      {"commentId":4678215,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"karenselfridge"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#26 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:58 PM EST
      {"commentId":4678826,"authorDomain":"katnip"}
      Katnip

      The answer is quite simple. Give Palestine back to the Palestinians. Let the Jews who spend hundreds of billions of dollars each year controlling our media and politicians take their money and put it to better use - they could buy enough land to make a country the same size as what they occupy now - but they would have earned it and bought it without bloodshed.  Let them buy it from a willing seller.  Honestly, for a change.

      {"commentId":4678826,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"katnip"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#27 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 11:00 PM EST
      {"commentId":4679220,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      Maxwell Despard

      You lost me at...

      Let the Jews who spend hundreds of billions of dollars each year controlling our media and politicians

      Israel deserves criticism, but there's no room for anti-semitism in the argument.

      {"commentId":4679220,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
      • 8 votes
      #27.1 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 11:46 PM EST
      {"commentId":4679771,"authorDomain":"karenselfridge"}
      crazy-798557

      Katnip  

      Perhaps you would prefer to move to rense.com.  More people there share your conspiracy views of Zionist Free Mason aliens controling the world.  I only hope you don't really believe what you wrote!  Israel "bought" their home with 3 million deaths.  Isn't that enough for you?

      {"commentId":4679771,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"karenselfridge"}
      • 1 vote
      #27.2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 12:56 AM EST
      {"commentId":4682899,"authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      Mystic Chick

      Zionist Free Mason aliens controling the world

      ROFLMAO

      {"commentId":4682899,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mysticchick"}
      • 2 votes
      #27.3 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 10:31 AM EST
      {"commentId":4683556,"authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
      rls8r

      According to Article 22 of the Hamas Charter (Covenant) it's not only the Freemasons, but also the Lion's Club, Rotary Club and others.  Don't leave them out of the greater Zionist conspiracy to control the world via politicians, banking, entertainment and media.  Be careful! The paranoids are after you.

      {"commentId":4683556,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"rlstanford"}
        #27.4 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:16 AM EST
        {"commentId":4683603,"authorDomain":"mdespard"}
        Maxwell Despard

        And NAMBLA. They're in on it, too.

        {"commentId":4683603,"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373","authorDomain":"mdespard"}
        • 1 vote
        #27.5 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:19 AM EST
        Reply
        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"460762","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"460762","contentId":"2274373"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking
        Back To Top | Front Page
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        • Newsvine Tools
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2010 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com