Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's column >>

ROBERT BLEVINS - AB OF SEATTLE

Home Page
Reporter: 'Are you a mod or a rocker?' Ringo Starr: 'I'm a MOCKER...'
Articles Posted: 480  Links Seeded: 294
Member Since: 3/2007  Last Seen: 5/15/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Eight Likely and Unlikely Ways Life on Earth Could End

Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:16 AM EDT
science, earth, pandemic, asteroid, armageddon, comet, global-extinction-event
By Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle
Advertise | AdChoices

Dr. Martin Rees, professor of astrophysics at Cambridge University, claimed in his book Our Final Century, that humans have only a 50-50 shot of making it through the 21st century without a major setback.

Presented in no particular order, here are a few of the ways life could end on Earth in the next hundred years:

1) Major Strike by an Asteroid or Comet

Pound for pound, comets are actually more dangerous than asteroids, because they travel a lot faster through space. Asteroids travel at about 25-30 km per second, while the speed of a comet approaches 70 km per second. The kinetic energy of an incoming object from space obeys the equation: Kinetic Energy = 1/2 the mass of the object x (velocity) ^ 2. Simply put, an object of just one and a half km in diameter hitting the Earth would release more energy than all the atomic bombs ever detonated. An object of 20 km diameter or more could cause mass extinction.

2) Earth is Swallowed by a Man-Made Black Hole

Although this scenario is unlikely, when the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider was being built at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York, it was theorized that a state of 'dense matter' could be formed, something that had never been done previously. Some scientists wondered if this could create a small 'black hole', which would suck matter from everything around it, until the entire Earth was gone. It is doubtful that the Brookhaven could create such a hole, but if they build bigger accelerators in the future, well, you never know...

3) Global Warming

The Earth is practically foaming at the mouth on whether it's man-made, a natural solar phenomenon, or nothing at all. Assuming it's real for the sake of argument, the worldwide temperature may rise as much as 2 degrees Celsius, hotter than anything in the last one and a half million years. It could lead to famine on a scale never before seen, mass migration, and fighting over the available resources still available. It probably wouldn't wipe man totally from the Earth, but things would be a lot worse than now.

4) Worldwide Pandemic

This scenario is highly likely to occur this century. The Influenza Pandemic of 1918 killed over 20 million people in about a year. The biggest risk here is that a virus such as HIV or smallpox could mutate until it was spread as easily as a common cold. Not everyone would die, since some people would be resistent to certain viruses, or entirely immune. It could thin out the population greatly, though. Perhaps by billions.

5) Robots Take Over The World

This is not as far-fetched as you think. Processing power doubles every year or two. By mid-century, robots could catch up to man in the ability to perform abstract thinking and may take over many functions presently perfomed by humans, including diagnosis of medical problems, scientific research, and other higher positions. It's even possible that humans may find immortality at last by uploading the content of their brains into advanced robots.

6) Gamma Ray Burst

These are a reletively new discovery, and there is much debate on the subject. However, if an intense GRB of at least thirty seconds duration occurred within 6,000 light years of Earth, it would likely wipe out most life on the planet. In any event, there would be few survivors. Currently, astronomers record an average of one or two a day anywhere in the known universe.

7) Nuclear Holocaust

Believe it or not, this threat is less serious than a half-century ago. International controls on the spread and use of nuclear weapons have been reasonably effective. Although a rogue state could cause severe damage to a specific target, the possibility of an all-out launch of thousands of nukes is unlikely. As time passes, if man is not actively constructing more weapons, the older ones will eventually become obsolete and likely be phased out of arsenals.

8) Overpopulation

This could be the biggest threat to continued life on the planet, because as more people need to be fed, it puts even greater pressure on our rapidly shrinking resources. Most of our present global problems can be linked to it in one way or another. Ever since the book The Population Bomb warned us about overpopulation back in the Sixties, it still remains the most realistic danger. People living on the planet as of today represent one in five of EVERYONE who has EVER lived on Earth...and it's getting worse. By 2050, the population of Earth will reach 9 billion or more. If you compare this growth to the history of the population up to this point, it is frightening.

It took the entire history of man until the year 1800 just to reach a population of one billion. Now we're adding another billion people to the planet about every fifteen years. Something has to give - and it certainly will. Combine this threat with some of the other threats listed above and it could mean the end of homo sapiens.

Time to stock up on plastic sheeting and duct tape.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (24)
Scott (Scoop) Butki

See there I got smarter just reading this.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun Jul 1, 2007 9:08 PM EDT
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Realistically, the overpopulation problem just won't go away. When you research the numbers right now, it just floors you. I looked at the numbers and felt a bit depressed.

This is a rough estimate, but I think that back in the late 1700's there were about 400 million people living on the planet. Imagine five times that number of people being added to the population in less than 50 more years...

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Jul 2, 2007 1:00 AM EDT
Reply
Expecting ExecutiveDeleted
Jacob Nicolas

robots could catch up to man in the ability to perform abstract thinking

It is desirable to guard against the possibility of exaggerated ideas that might arise as to the powers of the Analytical Engine. In considering any new subject, there is frequently a tendency, first, to overrate what we find to be already interesting or remarkable; and, secondly, by a sort of natural reaction, to undervalue the true state of the case, when we do discover that our notions have surpassed those that were really tenable. The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate any thing. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with. This it is calculated to effect primarily and chiefly of course, through its executive faculties; but it is likely to exert an indirect and reciprocal influence on science itself in another manner.

Lady Ada Byron Lovelace

I agree with her ^

    Reply#4 - Wed Jul 4, 2007 3:50 PM EDT
    Buzz Lightyear

    Especially dangerous are those gamma rays that travel slower than the speed of light. The poor physicists will be kept up at nights reinventing relativity during those years while the gamma rays crawl to earth.

      Reply#5 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:00 PM EDT
      Devin Blackmoon

      Dear Mr. Rees:

      Change the fracking channel, or turn off the computer, for God's sake. You, sir, are either a raving lunatic, or a dumbass, spending entirely too much time watching science fiction.

      I choose both.

      Please, do us all a favor, and go away.

      Love and kisses:

      The Sane People Of The World

      ps You are now a laughingstock. Please check Fark.com for your moment as a total ass of the internet.

        Reply#6 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:05 PM EDT
        Reply
        Mark-160988

        Devin Blackmon, As a sane person, I ask that you not speak for the rest of us sane people. Thank you. You honestly think that none of these are possibilities, especially overpopulation?

          Reply#7 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:35 PM EDT
          Jacob Nicolas

          A question?

          If robots were to take over the earth, what would they think of Steven Hawking? Would they recognize him as a robot? Make him their leader?

            Reply#8 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:43 PM EDT
            Devin Blackmoon

            Dear Mark - whatever:

            Absolutely. Humans are a tad more resilient than you think.

            Sir Rees needs to get away from the sci-fi for, oh say...ever.

            Sheesh.

            Pass me a grain of salt, please...preferably the size of Manhattan Island.

              Reply#9 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:47 PM EDT
              dave893

              exitmundi, is the name of a website dealing with more of this subject. its a bit fantastic.

                Reply#10 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 9:47 PM EDT
                D. Coveney

                Mr. Blackmoon, please go back to fark.com with the rest of the GED's.

                tyvl

                  Reply#11 - Fri Jul 6, 2007 11:42 PM EDT
                  tigerb2

                  The dumbass left out the super volcano under yellowstone park,we are in that window now,if it goes off,its over for life for awhile...well, it will take a few years of suffering of course without food for awhile,since the sun will be blocked out for about 5 yrs...

                    Reply#12 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 12:21 AM EDT
                    Davide AndreaDeleted
                    connor reed

                    Dear Captain Blackmoon,
                    As commander of the ship Denial, please don't speak on behalf of the rest of humanity.

                    A word about a few of your thoughts.

                    Science, not fiction, has proven the possibility of pandemic and overpopulation as a viable threat to every species on the globe if given the correct conditions and opportunity.

                    There is no reason to call a man insane or a dumb-ass for recognizing one or both options as a potential threat to human life continuing as we have known it.

                    "Whatever," is not the strongest rebuttal to choose when attempting to discredit the observations of another, especially, when attempting to come off as an intellectual yourself.

                    With my background and degree in science, I will agree, humans are resilient to many things. Starvation, however, is not one of those things.

                    Too many people + too little food = a weakened state of existence = the increased opportunity for disease to take hold = you being found at your computer in your mother's basement, calling people names over the internet and being eaten alive by diseased human-like zombies, staving off starvation.

                    Good luck with that sunshine,
                    Love and Kisses from all the sane, hungry, people of the world.

                    Regards,
                    connor reed

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#14 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 12:51 AM EDT
                    Reply
                    Russ loves Tiff

                    um...guys...wouldn't number 8 and number 4 tend to cancel each other out?

                      Reply#15 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 1:19 AM EDT
                      George-161058

                      Yes, the population will swell until 2050 then what, it will start dropping. The baby boomers wil be dead and even third world countries are starting to see 0 population growth. Cities like Detroit are becoming ghost towns.

                        Reply#16 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 1:20 AM EDT
                        Deep_Thought

                        Sir Martin Rees is correct, any of the events he has described has the potential to either wipe us out, or eliminate a vast amount of us.

                        Its a sobering thought.

                        There are a number of other events that are missing:

                        1. Micro-blackhole releasing enough thermal energy to boil the oceans of the planet.
                        2. An impact of dense material with our sun, introducing a 'poison' to the Nuclear fusion process, resulting in premature detonation, or mass ejections.
                        3. Collapse of the Earth Magnetic fields (Polar reversal) resulting in the loss of Van Allen belts and Radiation protection.
                        4. Reducing carbon emissions could result in a reduction of thermal energy in the atmosphere causing it to drop a significant proportion of dust. That may result in a rapid increase in temperature as the dust artifically cools the atmosphere. So, rather than CO2 reduction saving the planet, a mass decrease could act as a trigger to atmospheric instability and a spike in global temperatures.

                        There is a lot more that could be added to this list and all are highly plausible scenarios.

                        Statisitically speaking, he's correct on the 50/50 assumption. Statistics depend on your point of reference. If you look at it from the point of view of the entire universe, then the odds are low, but from the point of view of human, it either happens or it does not.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#17 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 2:03 AM EDT
                        James Wa

                        These are generally not as serious as Sir Martin Rees would have you believe.

                        As noted above, population growth is indeed slowing down; many areas of the globe are already experiencing stress from a drop in the population of young people. These trends will continue.

                        Human beings have dealt with massive pandemics in the past, with relatively little in the way of technology to combat illness. Humanity has survived the plague, smallpox, yellow fever, malaria, influenza, etc. in the past. Even native Americans were not wiped out in one major epidemic. Anthropologists now believe it was series of epidemics, wave after wave of illnesses affecting vulnerable, non-technological populations over decades that drastically reduced native populations. Humanity will survive the microbial menaces.

                        I believe in global warming, but the fact is that human beings are adapting agriculture to more difficult environments. Climate change will occur gradually, not overnight a la "The Day After Tomorrow" We will have time to adjust.

                        Cosmic events such as gamma ray bursts and impacts from near earth objects or comets happen on cosmic timelines; the earth will be struck again, but not likely tomorrow. We have a tendency to be afraid of very dramatic, yet mathematically unlikely events. (ex. in America people fear Ebola far more than the more common, and quite deadly, influenza) The same applies to the Yellowstone caldera.

                        Robots taking over humanity? Luddite fears at best.

                        In short, a slightly entertaining article, one that has already consumed far more of my time and energy than it is worth.

                          Reply#18 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 3:20 AM EDT
                          studiotom

                          I, for one, would love for Dr. Stephen Hawking's mind to be uploaded into a robot one day. It would be a godsend if he could live on for years to come, helping solve all the world's problems, including all eight listed above. I certainly think he could at least play a part in combating any of those scenarios, don't you?

                          But what if post-mortem robotization became so popular that everyone wanted to be reincarnated as a robot? Wouldn't that lead to a new kind of overpopulation, that of too many robots competing for a limited amount of resources? Would the robots be expected to earn their keep? How would homeless and disabled robots be treated, either by man or by other robots? Would there be robotic bigotry and infighting? What about robotic cloning? What about the possibility of pre-mortem robotization? Oh, so many questions... and what could be a very slippery slope!

                            Reply#19 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 4:27 AM EDT
                            Isaac Asimov

                            All hail our robot overlords!!!

                              Reply#20 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 6:35 AM EDT
                              ChallengeTheSea

                              Like Buzz says, gamma rays travel at light speed. There would be no time to prepare. While the article makes some valid points, I don't consider it particularly enlightening or entirely credible.

                                Reply#21 - Sat Jul 7, 2007 1:01 PM EDT
                                elated

                                yes will some of these comments could seem scary they aren't really something hitting the earth that causes more energy being released than all the atomic booms is not likely to happen because of they way of milky way is made. And over population one does have make a point ...but it would not be that the earth doesn't produce enough food that would cause the problem it would be human greed and hunger for power that would make the a world of 9billion plus a hard very hard place to live . thinking about it a 6billion no all the earth is populated for example only 10% of the united states is populated. but it's a nicely written article i enjoyed the part about the robots but i like you should try to learn more on how the human mind works . Thank you for this article Sir Martin Rees

                                  Reply#22 - Sun Jul 8, 2007 8:34 PM EDT
                                  gingivitis

                                  over population is a huge one. Mainly in china and japan over populating their countries. Now they come here and over-populate north america. Not to be racist or sound racist but up here in canada seems to be for ever 3 asian people you see 1 white person. An asian invasion alone could conquer every other race and destroy this world.

                                    Reply#23 - Mon Jul 9, 2007 2:52 PM EDT
                                    finsch

                                    Actually the most likely end of life on Earth, as the title of the article says, is heat exhaustion. As the fusion reactor that is the sun uses up its fuel it will put out more and more radiant heat. In a little less than a billion years this will probably reach a point where organic life on earth will no longer be viable. As for the end of human civilization; we are a much more immediate danger to ourselves than any external risk factor. Keep in mind that what constitutes overpopulation is relative to our ability to provide.

                                      Reply#24 - Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
                                      The Beave-3255810

                                      Overpopulation will be the deciding factor if the human species will survive or perish. We as a species must face the truth about the future of the planet and its ability to sustain us. Methods of feeding the inhabitants of Mother Earth must be revised.
                                      First of all we must quit being so fussy. When any aboriginals harvested an animal, they used every part of it for food. Now our pets eat some of the parts we throw away.
                                      Insects and their larva are repulsive to most of the civilized world. In reality insects are a good source of protein, easily farmed, producing less of a carbon footprint than any cow ever could.
                                      Like extreamophiles, we as a species must learn to adapt. Lately we have been slow to change. Our stubbornness will be the death of us. If we don't open our eyes soon, we will follow 99% of the species who have shared this planet and lost the battle.

                                        Reply#25 - Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:23 PM EDT
                                        YouAboutMe

                                        Please see my article at:

                                         

                                        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110331/sc_ac/8183135_global_overpopulation_problem_no_longer_taboo_subject

                                          Reply#26 - Fri Apr 1, 2011 10:23 AM EDT
                                          Leave a Comment:
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                          FUN STUFF:
                                          • Leaderboard |
                                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                                          • Top of the Vine |
                                          • Newsvine Live |
                                          • Newsvine Archives |
                                          • The Greenhouse |
                                          COMPANY STUFF:
                                          • Code of Honor |
                                          • Company Info |
                                          • Contact Us |
                                          • Jobs |
                                          • User Agreement |
                                          • Privacy Policy |
                                          • About our ads
                                          LEGAL STUFF:
                                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com